Use real funding history to prioritize the opportunities most likely to fund your clients — and skip the ones that won't. Not based on prompts or guesswork. Grounded in actual grant data across 3,800+ funders.
No account required. Works for US, Canadian, and UK clients. Takes 3 minutes.
Generic research gives you a list of funders whose mission language overlaps with your client's. That's not intelligence. That's a keyword match.
It misses the patterns that determine real outcomes: whether a funder only re-grants to existing partners, whether they've shifted their giving geography, what grant sizes they actually award versus what they claim to award, and whether they're realistically open to new applicants at all.
Every hour spent writing a proposal for the wrong funder is an hour that didn't move your client forward.
We analyze real grant history to show what's actually worth pursuing — before a word is written.
Mission language overlaps ≠ a fundable relationship. Real patterns live in the grant history, not the funder's website.
Many foundations primarily re-grant to existing relationships. Generic research doesn't flag this — so you write proposals that never had a chance.
Stated grant ranges are often aspirational. Actual award history tells a very different story about what a funder realistically gives.
Funders shift their giving regions without updating their listed criteria. Real data shows where money is actually going now.
The data for good funder decisions already exists. We've built the system to surface it.
Built on IRS 990 filings, CRA records, and UK charity data — not website descriptions. We identify real giving patterns: who they fund, what size grants they actually award, whether they have open or closed intake, and whether new applicants have ever broken through.
Every recommendation is scored on five factors: mission focus, geographic eligibility, grant size history, org type, and applicant openness. Clear reasoning behind every result.
Not keyword matching — pattern analysis. So you can show your client exactly why a funder made the shortlist, or why it didn't.
Evidence-backed shortlistsUS + Canada + UK in a unified database. No more siloed research across different tools and directories. Serve cross-border clients without a cross-border research stack.
One intake. One ranked list. Three markets. Each with real filing data behind every result.
One tool, three marketsOnce you've confirmed a funder is worth pursuing, generate a starting draft aligned to their priorities and your client's mission. A structured first pass — not a finished proposal.
This is the bonus, not the headline. The real value is knowing which funders to approach in the first place.
The workflow is built around decisions, not documents.
Enter mission, focus area, geography, budget, and org type. Takes about 3 minutes. This is the only guesswork-free step — it's just your client's actual profile.
Get a ranked shortlist based on real giving history — with clear reasoning for each match. More importantly: see which funders to skip.
Once you've validated fit, generate a first-pass application draft for that specific funder. Optional. Use it as a structured starting point, not a finished product.
Most consultants spend 5–8 hours per client on funder research alone. That time has a real cost. Here's a conservative look at what better decisions are worth.
If you want early access, we'll onboard you directly. Run a free funder analysis for one of your trickiest clients — no strings attached. If it's useful, we'd love your feedback. If it's not, we want to know that too.
Reach us at hello@charitygrantwriter.com with your firm name and a quick note about your client base.
You can — but most research surfaces broad matches, not actual funding patterns. We analyze real grant history to show which funders support organizations like your clients, how much they typically give, and whether they accept new applicants. The difference isn't speed — it's knowing where to focus.
No. CharityGrantWriter is a funder intelligence tool — it handles the research-intensive parts so you can do more high-value work: strategy, client relationships, proposal refinement, submission management. Think of it as a research analyst who's already read every public filing in three countries.
Each funder is scored on five factors derived from real filing data: mission and focus alignment, geographic eligibility, grant size history, org type fit, and whether the funder realistically accepts new applicants. Every match includes its reasoning, so you can validate with your own professional judgment — which is exactly how it should work.
The US, Canada, and the United Kingdom — foundations, corporate giving programs, and government-backed grants across all three markets in one unified system. No more siloed research across separate directories.
Funder match reports and proposal drafts are currently delivered without CharityGrantWriter branding — you can incorporate them into your own deliverables. Branded white-label reports are in development for consultant accounts.
Yes. Intake data is never used to train models and is never shared with other users. Submissions are retained for 12 months and then deleted. You can request early deletion at hello@charitygrantwriter.com.
Run a free funder intelligence analysis for one of your clients — ranked matches with reasoning based on real grant history. Takes 3 minutes. Costs nothing.